Article on Fairness and Validity of Cognitive Assessments

The May-June 2008 edition of American Psychologist has a great lead article by Paul Sackett, Matthew Borneman, and Brian Connelly entitled “High stakes testing in higher education and employment: Appraising the evidence for validity and fairness.” As the Abstract states:

The authors review criticisms commonly leveled against cognitively loaded tests used for employment and higher education admissions decisions, with a focus on large-scale databases and meta-analytic evidence. They conclude that (a) tests of developed abilities are generally valid for their intended uses in predicting a wide variety of aspects of short-term and long-term academic and job performance, (b) validity is not an artifact of socioeconomic status, (c) coaching is not a major determinant of test performance, (d) tests do not generally exhibit bias by underpredicting the performance of minority group members, and (e) test-taking motivational mechanisms are not major determinants of test performance in these high-stakes settings.